Diddy‘s asking the choose in his case for a mistrial once more … accusing prosecutors of presenting testimony they knew — or ought to’ve recognized — was false.
The rapper and mogul’s authorized crew filed the letter Saturday morning … and, the explanations for his or her request are associated to testimony concerning the alleged incident the place Bryana Bongolan — a good friend of Cassie‘s and clothier — says Diddy held her over the sting of a balcony, 17 tales within the air.
Diddy’s legal professionals say prosecutors offered unfaithful testimony when Cassie testified concerning the incident as a result of she mentioned she really noticed Diddy holding Bryana over the balcony’s edge.
Nevertheless, texts from Cassie to Kristina Khorram — one among Diddy’s staff typically known as his chief of employees — point out she did not really see the incident … as a result of she texted, “I simply discovered some loopy s***.”
Diddy’s attorneys additionally level to the pictures prosecutors confirmed of Bryana’s alleged accidents. Bear in mind, Bongolan testified that Diddy dangled her over the sting of the balcony, then pulled her again onto the balcony and flung her into some furnishings.
She mentioned she sustained bruises on her leg and neck accidents … with prosecutors displaying pictures they mentioned have been taken of the alleged accidents. The picture metadata proved they have been taken on September 26, 2016.
TMZ.com
Nevertheless, Diddy’s crew offered proof that the mogul was on the East Coast and could not have performed something he was accused of on September 26. Prosecutors later clarified that Cassie’s textual content — the one talked about above — appears to point it occurred later within the week, round September 29 or 30.
TMZ.com
That is the second time Diddy has filed for a mistrial … simply final month his legal professionals requested for a mistrial when it got here to the destruction of fingerprints on the Molotov cocktail bottle allegedly used to destroy Child Cudi‘s automobile.
Diddy argued the information that the fingerprints have been destroyed was meant to prejudice the jury … the choose denied their mistrial request.
The choose has but to rule on this new request for a mistrial, however he might determine at any time … so, keep tuned.
